GAYATHRI U vs RAMANI L Advocate - MANOGARAN S — 37/2021
Case under Codeofcivilprocedure Section O7,R1,S26. Disposed: Contested--Decreed with cost on 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP010002842021
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
301/2021
Filing Date
14-06-2021
Registration No
37/2021
Registration Date
15-06-2021
Court
Principal District Court, Ranipet
Judge
2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Decreed with cost
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAYATHRI U
Adv. SELVARAAJ A G
Respondent(s)
RAMANI L Advocate - MANOGARAN S
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Disposed
Judgement
Arguments
Arguments
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement | |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 16-03-2026 | Arguments | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The I Additional District Judge, Ranipet decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Gayathri, granting specific performance of the sale agreement dated 03.02.2021. The court found that defendant L. Ramani validly executed the agreement to sell her property for Rs. 50,50,000, having received Rs. 50,00,000 advance. The defendant must now execute and register the sale deed upon the plaintiff depositing the remaining Rs. 50,000 within one month, with court-assisted registration available if the defendant defaults. The court rejected the defendant's forgery claim, finding the plaintiff and witness testimony credible and the defendant's delayed response to the legal notice suspicious. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Court Decision Summary The I Additional District Judge, Ranipet decreed the suit in favor of plaintiff Gayathri, granting specific performance of the sale agreement dated 03.02.2021. The court found that defendant L. Ramani validly executed the agreement to sell her property for Rs. 50,50,000, having received Rs. 50,00,000 advance. The defendant must now execute and register the sale deed upon the plaintiff depositing the remaining Rs. 50,000 within one month, with court-assisted registration available if the defendant defaults. The court rejected the defendant's forgery claim, finding the plaintiff and witness testimony credible and the defendant's delayed response to the legal notice suspicious. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts