KALAISELVI R vs RAJA P Advocate - ANANDACHARI P V — 20/2016
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 37(R)AND27(C)OFTNCFACT. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 27th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRP010002732016
Next Hearing
27th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
527/2016
Filing Date
18-04-2016
Registration No
20/2016
Registration Date
18-04-2016
Court
Principal District Court, Ranipet
Judge
2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KALAISELVI R
Adv. VIVEKANANDAN M
Respondent(s)
RAJA P Advocate - ANANDACHARI P V
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 06-04-2026 | Evidence | |
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence | |
| 09-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final court order with a substantive ruling) in an original suit (OS.No.20/2016) before the I-Additional District Court, Ranipet. The witness, Kalaiselvi (PW-1), was examined on 23.03.2026 regarding a property sale transaction involving real estate dealings and purchase agreements. The document records her cross-examination testimony concerning property ownership documents, payment terms, and authority letters, with the judge noting various inconsistencies and deficiencies in the evidence presented by both parties. This is part of the ongoing trial proceedings and does not constitute a final judgment or order on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final court order with a substantive ruling) in an original suit (OS.No.20/2016) before the I-Additional District Court, Ranipet. The witness, Kalaiselvi (PW-1), was examined on 23.03.2026 regarding a property sale transaction involving real estate dealings and purchase agreements. The document records her cross-examination testimony concerning property ownership documents, payment terms, and authority letters, with the judge noting various inconsistencies and deficiencies in the evidence presented by both parties. This is part of the ongoing trial proceedings and does not constitute a final judgment or order on the merits of the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts