VACHALA K vs AALIYA BEGUM K — 48/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7 R1 S26. Disposed: Contested--Partially Allowed on 05th March 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRP010002632021

Case disposed

Filing Number

281/2021

Filing Date

28-04-2021

Registration No

48/2021

Registration Date

20-07-2021

Court

Principal District Court, Ranipet

Judge

2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

Decision Date

05th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Partially Allowed

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7 R1 S26

Petitioner(s)

VACHALA K

Adv. MANJULA SANKARAN

RAJASEKAR K

Adv. MANJULA SANKARAN

Respondent(s)

AALIYA BEGUM K

HAKILA BEGUM K

MYNUDDIN K

RASHIMA BI

SHAMEEM R ALAIS SHAMEEMUNISSA R

MOHAMMED IMRAN R

THE SUB REGISTRAR, WALAJA TALUK

Hearing History

Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet

05-03-2026

Disposed

27-02-2026

Judgement

20-02-2026

Judgement

18-02-2026

Arguments

11-02-2026

Arguments

Final Orders / Judgements

05-03-2026
Copy of Judgment/Order

Court Summary The Additional District Judge, Ranipet partly decreed the suit, holding that only the 2nd plaintiff (son) is entitled to a 2/8 share in the deceased Kareemuddin's property under Muslim law, while the 1st plaintiff (claiming to be the first wife) received no relief. The court found the marriage between the Hindu 1st plaintiff and Muslim deceased was not validly proved but recognized the legitimacy of their son's inheritance rights. The sale deed dated 06.04.2017 was declared void only regarding the 2nd plaintiff's share, and the application for permanent injunction was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Court Summary The Additional District Judge, Ranipet partly decreed the suit, holding that only the 2nd plaintiff (son) is entitled to a 2/8 share in the deceased Kareemuddin's property under Muslim law, while the 1st plaintiff (claiming to be the first wife) received no relief. The court found the marriage between the Hindu 1st plaintiff and Muslim deceased was not validly proved but recognized the legitimacy of their son's inheritance rights. The sale deed dated 06.04.2017 was declared void only regarding the 2nd plaintiff's share, and the application for permanent injunction was dismissed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Principal District Court, Ranipet All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case