INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARCOT TOWN P.S. vs BASKAR S — 20/2020
Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 147,148,342,294(B),323, 324,,307, 302 , R/W 149. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
SC - Sessions Case
CNR: TNRP010000542020
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
20/2020
Filing Date
04-02-2020
Registration No
20/2020
Registration Date
04-02-2020
Court
Principal District Court, Ranipet
Judge
2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ARCOT TOWN P.S.
Adv. ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
BASKAR S
KANNAN ALAIS SENTHAMARAI KANNAN
SILAMBARASAN ALAIS TAMILSELVAN
PREM ALAIS PREMKUMAR
SARATH ALAIS SARATHKUMAR
Adv. KRISHNAMOORTHY C
VIGNESH
KABILAN ALAIS POONGODUKABILAN
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW4) recorded on 12.02.2026 in case SC.No.20/2020 at the I Additional District Court, Ranipet. The witness, a vehicle driver and snack shop owner, testified that he had no direct knowledge of the incident in question as he was not present at the scene, and stated he did not know the details about who attacked whom or with what weapons. The court noted that defendants 1, 3-7 were present and defendant 2 was absent; a motion under CrPC Section 311 was approved on 25.09.2025 to recall the witness for cross-examination, and cross-examination by the defense counsel was conducted with no cross-examination from the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (PW4) recorded on 12.02.2026 in case SC.No.20/2020 at the I Additional District Court, Ranipet. The witness, a vehicle driver and snack shop owner, testified that he had no direct knowledge of the incident in question as he was not present at the scene, and stated he did not know the details about who attacked whom or with what weapons. The court noted that defendants 1, 3-7 were present and defendant 2 was absent; a motion under CrPC Section 311 was approved on 25.09.2025 to recall the witness for cross-examination, and cross-examination by the defense counsel was conducted with no cross-examination from the prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts