NASAR SHARIF R S vs GHOUSE SHARIFF R S Advocate - EXPARTE — 100018/2013
Case under Suitsvaluationact Section 37(2)27(c)CFACT. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNRP010000462013
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
100018/2013
Filing Date
19-07-2013
Registration No
100018/2013
Registration Date
19-07-2013
Court
Principal District Court, Ranipet
Judge
2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NASAR SHARIF R S
Adv. MOHAMMED SADHIQUDDIN D
H YOUSUF SHARIFF
MUBEEN
ABDUL RAHAMAN
SYED IMRAN
SHOWKATH TABBUSSUM
Respondent(s)
GHOUSE SHARIFF R S Advocate - EXPARTE
SABEERA BEGUM
JAHANNARA BEGUM
IMRAN SHARIFF
RIZWAN SHARIFF
SAARAN SHARIFF
R S AFZAL SHERIFF SAHEB
MAZHAR SHARIFF SAHEB
SHAKIRA BEGUM
ABDULLAH SHARIFF SAHEB
ZAKIRA BEGUM
ZAKIYA BEGUM
MUZAFFAR SHARIFF SAHEB
NAZIR BEGUM
KHUTHAIJA
JAVEED
JUNAID
NAVEED
MADEENA
SHAHIDA PARVEEN
SAJEED JABEEN
R S BASEETH
ASMA MUBBEN
R S WAJID
R S AHAD
FEROZE BEGUM
JANAB K O JAHANGIR BASHA
J AMEER BASHA
A R MUSHTHAQ
NAHIDA
THAHIRA
RIYAZ
AAKHILA
SHAKILA
ZEENATH
ASMATH
ASHARAF
SHOWKATH
IMTIYAZ
MUSSARRATH
AMEENA
MAQBOOL
FATHIMA
RAHAMATH BI SAHEBA
SARDAR BEGUM
K MD HANEEF
SURAIYA
SABIHA
SUFIYA
SAIRA
K MD SHAKEEL
IQBAL BEGUM
FATHIMA SHEIREEN
R Q ABDUL GHANI
R Q ABDUL HUQ
R Q ABDUL KAREEM
NOORJAHAN
AAYISHA
SHAISTHA
ARMAAN
R S HABIBULLA SHERIFF
Adv. SUNDARI R.T
ARJUMAN
FAHAMIDA
SHAMSHAD BEGUM
ALTHAF
AFTHAB
METHAB
R J ASIF
Hearing History
Judge: 2-I Additional District Judge, Ranipet
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 01-04-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending | |
| 25-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 18-03-2026 | Steps | |
| 16-03-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the application to implead the legal heirs of the deceased 35th defendant (four proposed parties numbered 92-95) in the ongoing partition suit filed in 2013. The court found the application was filed within the limitation period as per the Supreme Court's COVID-19 relief order, and deemed it necessary for proper adjudication of the partition case. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the application to implead the legal heirs of the deceased 35th defendant (four proposed parties numbered 92-95) in the ongoing partition suit filed in 2013. The court found the application was filed within the limitation period as per the Supreme Court's COVID-19 relief order, and deemed it necessary for proper adjudication of the partition case. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts