Krishnan vs Mohamed Riyas — 5/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 09-Apr-2026

STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case

CNR: TNRM170030352024

Filing Number

3029/2024

Filing Date

14-Jun-2024

Registration No

5/2025

Registration Date

08-Jan-2025

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Last updated 05-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142
Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section KrishnanMohamed Riyas

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Krishnan

    Adv. Tr.S.Kamaraj

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohamed Riyas

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  3. 07-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 11-Nov-2025

    Questioning

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 16-Oct-2025

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 18-Sep-2025

    Copies

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 17-Sep-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 28-Aug-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 11-Aug-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  13. 11-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  14. 10-Jul-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  15. 09-May-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  16. 28-Mar-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  17. 20-Feb-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  18. 08-Jan-2025

    Service Pending

    Judicial Magistrate

  19. 26-Dec-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  20. 20-Dec-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  21. 13-Dec-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  22. 27-Nov-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  23. 06-Nov-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  24. 24-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  25. 08-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  26. 03-Oct-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  27. 27-Sep-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  28. 03-Sep-2024

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  29. 20-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    SUMMARY: This is a witness deposition (PW-1) in Case No. Cr.M.P. No. 2595/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, dated 20.08.2024. The witness testifies that he lent ₹3,00,000 to the defendant (Muhammad Riyas) in two installments (₹10,000 via GAPY on 08.09.2021 and ₹2,90,000 in cash on 08.11.2021) for the defendant's house expenses, and later received a cheque for ₹3,00,000 dated 27.10.2022, which was returned unpaid on 04.11.2022. The witness alleges the defendant fraudulently misappropriated the money and has filed this complaint seeking appropriate action and recovery of the amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  30. 20-Aug-2024

    Enquiry

    Judicial Magistrate

  31. 26-Jul-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate

  32. 16-Jul-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate

  33. 03-Jul-2024

    Sworn Statement

    Judicial Magistrate

  34. 14-Jun-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 14-Jun-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: This is a witness deposition (PW-1) in Case No. Cr.M.P. No. 2595/2024 before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai, dated 20.08.2024. The witness testifies that he lent ₹3,00,000 to the defendant (Muhammad Riyas) in two installments (₹10,000 via GAPY on 08.09.2021 and ₹2,90,000 in cash on 08.11.2021) for the defendant's house expenses, and later received a cheque for ₹3,00,000 dated 27.10.2022, which was returned unpaid on 04.11.2022. The witness alleges the defendant fraudulently misappropriated the money and has filed this complaint seeking appropriate action and recovery of the amount. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case