The Sub Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station. vs Michealraj Advocate - Tr.M.vijay — 396/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,324. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th August 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM170023702022
Filing Number
4471/2022
Filing Date
26-Dec-2022
Registration No
396/2022
Registration Date
27-Dec-2022
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
47
Police Station
R.S MANGALAM P.S
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Sub Inspector of Police, R.S.Mangalam Police Station.
Adv. APP Gr.I
Respondent(s)
-
1.Michealraj Advocate - Tr.M.vijay
-
2.Santhoshkumar
Adv. Tr.M.vijay
Case History
-
04-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
09-Jun-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This document records the deposition of witness PW-3 (Anitha) in Case No. 396/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai on 10.11.2025. The witness testified regarding an incident on 04.03.2020 involving accused Michealraj and Santhoshkumar allegedly assaulting her father in a field; she confirmed police visited the scene and took photographs. During cross-examination, the defense challenged her credibility regarding her role in the complaint and the nature of her testimony. The court recorded both examination-in-chief and cross-examination statements, which were read over and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
28-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
01-Jul-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Jun-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
30-Apr-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
17-Mar-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Feb-2025
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Sep-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jul-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-May-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Mar-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Feb-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Feb-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2024
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Jan-2024
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Dec-2023
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
05-Dec-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Nov-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Oct-2023
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Sep-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Aug-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Jul-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
14-Jul-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Jun-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Apr-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
15-Feb-2023
Service Pending
Judicial Magistrate
-
25-Jan-2023
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
27-Dec-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Dec-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 396/2022
This document records the deposition of witness PW-3 (Anitha) in Case No. 396/2022 before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai on 10.11.2025. The witness testified regarding an incident on 04.03.2020 involving accused Michealraj and Santhoshkumar allegedly assaulting her father in a field; she confirmed police visited the scene and took photographs. During cross-examination, the defense challenged her credibility regarding her role in the complaint and the nature of her testimony. The court recorded both examination-in-chief and cross-examination statements, which were read over and admitted as correct by the witness. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts