RAJASEKARAN vs SANTHAKUMAR — 22/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 138,223. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNRM170020042025
e-Filing Number
24-09-2025
Filing Number
1978/2025
Filing Date
26-Sep-2025
Registration No
22/2026
Registration Date
10-Nov-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAJASEKARAN
Adv. Selvaraj A
Respondent(s)
-
1.SANTHAKUMAR
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Mar-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Feb-2026
Appearance
Judicial Magistrate
-
23-Jan-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Jan-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This document is a witness deposition (not a court order with a substantive ruling), recorded on 12.01.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Thiruvadanai in Case No. Crl.MP. No.640/2025. The witness (PW-1) testified regarding a cheque transaction of ₹5,00,000 dated 23.05.2025 that was later returned due to insufficient funds, and provided documentary evidence including bank receipts and tracking reports. The deposition was recorded in open court, interpreted to the witness, and admitted as correct by the deponent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Jan-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
31-Dec-2025
Sworn Statement
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Dec-2025
Sworn Statement
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2026
This document is a witness deposition (not a court order with a substantive ruling), recorded on 12.01.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate Court at Thiruvadanai in Case No. Crl.MP. No.640/2025. The witness (PW-1) testified regarding a cheque transaction of ₹5,00,000 dated 23.05.2025 that was later returned due to insufficient funds, and provided documentary evidence including bank receipts and tracking reports. The deposition was recorded in open court, interpreted to the witness, and admitted as correct by the deponent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts