The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station vs LENIN RAJ — 311/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281, 106(1). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM170017772025
e-Filing Number
30-08-2025
Filing Number
1758/2025
Filing Date
01-Sep-2025
Registration No
311/2025
Registration Date
02-Sep-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
138
Police Station
THONDI P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station
Adv. APP Gr.I
Respondent(s)
-
1.LENIN RAJ
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
This is a witness deposition record (not a court order with a substantive outcome). The witness testified on 12.03.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate at Thiruvadanai in criminal case C.C. No. 311/2025, describing an accident incident involving the accused and providing details about police investigation procedures. The deposition was recorded, read over to the witness, and admitted as correct; no cross-examination by the defence occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Feb-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Nov-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
08-Oct-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 311/2025
This is a witness deposition record (not a court order with a substantive outcome). The witness testified on 12.03.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate at Thiruvadanai in criminal case C.C. No. 311/2025, describing an accident incident involving the accused and providing details about police investigation procedures. The deposition was recorded, read over to the witness, and admitted as correct; no cross-examination by the defence occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts