The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station vs RAKUMATH BEEVI — 467/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,294(b),323,506(2). Status: Orders. Next hearing: 29th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM170015452025
Next Hearing
29th May 2026
e-Filing Number
05-08-2025
Filing Number
1526/2025
Filing Date
14-08-2025
Registration No
467/2025
Registration Date
21-08-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
19
Police Station
THIRUVADANAI P.S
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station
Adv. APP Gr.I
SULAIMAN
Adv. Inspector of Police Thiruvadanai PS
Respondent(s)
RAKUMATH BEEVI
NASEER AHAMED
NOOR MOHAMED
BAVA USAIN
ANSAR
SAKUBAR ALI
SEKARATH
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
Orders
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-05-2026 | Orders |
| 28-04-2026 | Orders |
| 17-04-2026 | Orders |
| 30-03-2026 | Orders |
| 12-03-2026 | Orders |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No: Cr.M.P. No. 467/2025 | Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai The witness deposition (PW-3) was terminated and concluded after the witness gave contradictory statements regarding her relationship with the complainant Sunaiman. The court found that the witness deliberately concealed the truth and provided false information, initially claiming Sunaiman was a neighbor but later admitting he was her brother-in-law. Due to this dishonesty, the witness examination was discontinued and formal closure was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No: Cr.M.P. No. 467/2025 | Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai The witness deposition (PW-3) was terminated and concluded after the witness gave contradictory statements regarding her relationship with the complainant Sunaiman. The court found that the witness deliberately concealed the truth and provided false information, initially claiming Sunaiman was a neighbor but later admitting he was her brother-in-law. Due to this dishonesty, the witness examination was discontinued and formal closure was ordered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts