Thiruvadanai Police Station vs Boominathan — 243/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 03rd June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM170015372025
e-Filing Number
11-08-2025
Filing Number
1518/2025
Filing Date
14-Aug-2025
Registration No
243/2025
Registration Date
21-Aug-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
03-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
287
Police Station
THIRUVADANAI P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Thiruvadanai Police Station
Adv. Inspector of Police Thiruvadanai PS
-
2.Marimuthu
Adv. Inspector of Police Thiruvadanai PS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Boominathan
-
2.Muthumanickam(Manickam)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 243/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvadanai acquitted both accused, Boominathan and Muthumanickam, of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (3 counts), 323, and the TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were released under CrPC section 248(1), and their bail bonds were cancelled. Key Reasoning: Despite allegations that the two accused assaulted the complainant with a wooden stick, causing injuries, the court found critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case. Multiple government witnesses gave contradictory statements—some claimed to have no knowledge of the incident, while the victim herself testified inconsistently about how injuries occurred. The court determined the prosecution witnesses provided false or unreliable evidence that undermined the case, making conviction impossible under the reasonable doubt standard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
26-May-2026
Judgement
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
18-May-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
18-May-2026
Questioning
Judicial Magistrate
-
20-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
11-Dec-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
05-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Nov-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
29-Sep-2025
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
21-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
14-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 243/2025
Case Summary: CC No. 243/2025 Court Decision: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvadanai acquitted both accused, Boominathan and Muthumanickam, of charges under IPC sections 294(b) (3 counts), 323, and the TN Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The accused were released under CrPC section 248(1), and their bail bonds were cancelled. Key Reasoning: Despite allegations that the two accused assaulted the complainant with a wooden stick, causing injuries, the court found critical weaknesses in the prosecution's case. Multiple government witnesses gave contradictory statements—some claimed to have no knowledge of the incident, while the victim herself testified inconsistently about how injuries occurred. The court determined the prosecution witnesses provided false or unreliable evidence that undermined the case, making conviction impossible under the reasonable doubt standard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts