The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station vs Prabu — 188/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b), 323, 324. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM170007922025
e-Filing Number
22-05-2025
Filing Number
780/2025
Filing Date
23-May-2025
Registration No
188/2025
Registration Date
04-Aug-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
198
Police Station
THONDI P.S
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station
Adv. APP Gr.I
-
2.SI VISHNU
Adv. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THONDI PS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Prabu
-
2.Sethukumar (Rasu)
-
3.Naganathan (Dinesh)
Case History
-
11-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
21-May-2026
Copy of Deposition
-
21-May-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
16-Apr-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
-
12-Mar-2026
Copy of DepositionView PDF
Case No: C.C. No.188/2025 Witness deposition recorded before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai on 12.03.2026. PW-2 testified that he witnessed an assault on one Murugesan approximately 3 years ago, who was taken to hospital with head injuries, and later accompanied the victim to file a complaint against three accused persons. A petition under Section 355 BNSS was filed and allowed; Accused A1 and A3 were present while A2 was absent during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judicial Magistrate
-
22-Jan-2026
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
19-Dec-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Oct-2025
Trial
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Sep-2025
Framing of Charges
Judicial Magistrate
-
04-Aug-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 188/2025
Case No: C.C. No.188/2025 Witness deposition recorded before the Judicial Magistrate, Thiruvadanai on 12.03.2026. PW-2 testified that he witnessed an assault on one Murugesan approximately 3 years ago, who was taken to hospital with head injuries, and later accompanied the victim to file a complaint against three accused persons. A petition under Section 355 BNSS was filed and allowed; Accused A1 and A3 were present while A2 was absent during proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts