The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station vs XAVIER — 288/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 290. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.
STC - Small Cause Calendar case / Summary Trial Case
CNR: TNRM170007552025
Next Hearing
03rd July 2026
e-Filing Number
20-05-2025
Filing Number
743/2025
Filing Date
21-05-2025
Registration No
288/2025
Registration Date
27-05-2025
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
FIR Details
FIR Number
91
Police Station
THONDI P.S
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station
Adv. APP Gr.I
Respondent(s)
XAVIER
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Trial |
| 25-11-2025 | Trial |
Interim Orders
Summary: This is a witness deposition (not a court judgment) recorded on 12.03.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai in Case No. ST.C. No.288/2025. Witness Sridaran, a Divisional Excise Officer, testified regarding an election-related incident on 09.04.2024 where loudspeakers and party flags were used in violation of election rules, leading to a complaint filed at Thandi police station. The witness's testimony was subjected to cross-examination by the defence, which challenged various aspects of his account including the location specifics, absence of equipment seizure, and lack of verification of permissions and party affiliation details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: This is a witness deposition (not a court judgment) recorded on 12.03.2026 before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai in Case No. ST.C. No.288/2025. Witness Sridaran, a Divisional Excise Officer, testified regarding an election-related incident on 09.04.2024 where loudspeakers and party flags were used in violation of election rules, leading to a complaint filed at Thandi police station. The witness's testimony was subjected to cross-examination by the defence, which challenged various aspects of his account including the location specifics, absence of equipment seizure, and lack of verification of permissions and party affiliation details. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts