Kalil Rahuman and other(Splitup petition CC 122- vs Thiruppalaikudi PS — 295/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 355(2). Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM170006782026

Filing Number

668/2026

Filing Date

16-Apr-2026

Registration No

295/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 16-Jul-2026

FIR Details

Police Station

THIRUPPALAIKUDI P.S

Year

0

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 355(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kalil Rahuman and other(Splitup petition CC 122-

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Thiruppalaikudi PS (Police Station)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: The court allowed the petition by 16 accused persons (A1-A16) to split proceedings against a 17th accused (A17) under Section 355(2) of BNSS. Despite diligent efforts, summons could not be served on A17, while A1-A16 regularly attended hearings. The court found that continuing to wait for A17's appearance would delay justice and was unjust, particularly since A1-A16 complied with all legal requirements. The court ordered proceedings against A17 to be separated into a fresh case file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 29-May-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 26-May-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 22-May-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 15-May-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  9. 14-May-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  10. 13-May-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  11. 20-Apr-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  12. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 16-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 295/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court allowed the petition by 16 accused persons (A1-A16) to split proceedings against a 17th accused (A17) under Section 355(2) of BNSS. Despite diligent efforts, summons could not be served on A17, while A1-A16 regularly attended hearings. The court found that continuing to wait for A17's appearance would delay justice and was unjust, particularly since A1-A16 complied with all legal requirements. The court ordered proceedings against A17 to be separated into a fresh case file. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case