Palani(bail) vs Inspector of police Thiruvadanai — 232/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM170005192026
Filing Number
512/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
232/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
18
Police Station
THIRUVADANAI P.S
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Palani(bail)
Respondent(s)
-
1.Inspector of police Thiruvadanai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai granted bail to the accused (Palani, 37) in Criminal Case No. 55/2026, who was charged under Sections 221, 296(b), 351(3) BNS and 4(1)(j) TNP Act for appearing in court in an intoxicated state and threatening court staff. The court found that since investigation was completed, the final report was filed, the accused posed no flight risk as a local resident, and mere pendency of other cases cannot bar bail, further incarceration was unwarranted. Bail was granted on conditions including executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting at 10:30 AM, cooperation with trial, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 232/2026
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai granted bail to the accused (Palani, 37) in Criminal Case No. 55/2026, who was charged under Sections 221, 296(b), 351(3) BNS and 4(1)(j) TNP Act for appearing in court in an intoxicated state and threatening court staff. The court found that since investigation was completed, the final report was filed, the accused posed no flight risk as a local resident, and mere pendency of other cases cannot bar bail, further incarceration was unwarranted. Bail was granted on conditions including executing a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily police station reporting at 10:30 AM, cooperation with trial, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts