Mahendran vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruppalaikudi Police Station Advocate - APP Gr.I — 196/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM170004812026
Filing Number
474/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
196/2026
Registration Date
06-Mar-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mahendran
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruppalaikudi Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) Gr.I
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai dismissed the bail petition filed by two accused persons (Magendran and Anbumanikandan) charged under Section 304(2) BNS for allegedly throwing chilli powder on a complainant's face and snatching her chain with threats of a sickle. The court rejected bail based on the seriousness of allegations, pending investigation at a crucial stage, the accused's previous criminal history, and insufficient justification from the defense to warrant release at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate
-
13-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate
-
12-Mar-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate
-
10-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
09-Mar-2026
Issue of Service
Judicial Magistrate
-
06-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 196/2026
The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai dismissed the bail petition filed by two accused persons (Magendran and Anbumanikandan) charged under Section 304(2) BNS for allegedly throwing chilli powder on a complainant's face and snatching her chain with threats of a sickle. The court rejected bail based on the seriousness of allegations, pending investigation at a crucial stage, the accused's previous criminal history, and insufficient justification from the defense to warrant release at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts