Sasikala vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruppalaikudi Police Station Advocate - APP Gr.I — 195/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 12th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM170004802026

Filing Number

473/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

195/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sasikala

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruppalaikudi Police Station Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor) Gr.I

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai allowed the petition and granted interim custody of a 7-1/2 sovereigns gold chain with dollar to petitioner Sasikala, following Supreme Court guidelines in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat* that seized valuable properties should not deteriorate in police custody. The petitioner must execute a Rs. 10,00,000 bond with surety, maintain the property unaltered, provide photographs, and produce it as required for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 195/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai allowed the petition and granted interim custody of a 7-1/2 sovereigns gold chain with dollar to petitioner Sasikala, following Supreme Court guidelines in *Sunderbhai Ambalal Desai v. State of Gujarat* that seized valuable properties should not deteriorate in police custody. The petitioner must execute a Rs. 10,00,000 bond with surety, maintain the property unaltered, provide photographs, and produce it as required for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case