Yasar arabath vs Forest Ranger — 188/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM170004732026
Filing Number
466/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
188/2026
Registration Date
06-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yasar arabath
Respondent(s)
Forest Ranger
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 11-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 10-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Thiruvadanai granted bail to Yaasar Arabath, accused of illegal wildlife trafficking under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972, finding that continued incarceration was unwarranted given the accused's clean criminal record, permanent local residence, substantial completion of investigation, and recovery of the contraband (8.6 kg dried seahorses). The court imposed stringent bail conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearance for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Thiruvadanai granted bail to Yaasar Arabath, accused of illegal wildlife trafficking under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972, finding that continued incarceration was unwarranted given the accused's clean criminal record, permanent local residence, substantial completion of investigation, and recovery of the contraband (8.6 kg dried seahorses). The court imposed stringent bail conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearance for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts