Yasar arabath vs Forest Ranger — 188/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 16th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM170004732026

Filing Number

466/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

188/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yasar arabath

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Forest Ranger

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Thiruvadanai granted bail to Yaasar Arabath, accused of illegal wildlife trafficking under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972, finding that continued incarceration was unwarranted given the accused's clean criminal record, permanent local residence, substantial completion of investigation, and recovery of the contraband (8.6 kg dried seahorses). The court imposed stringent bail conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearance for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  8. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 188/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court at Thiruvadanai granted bail to Yaasar Arabath, accused of illegal wildlife trafficking under the Wildlife Protection Act 1972, finding that continued incarceration was unwarranted given the accused's clean criminal record, permanent local residence, substantial completion of investigation, and recovery of the contraband (8.6 kg dried seahorses). The court imposed stringent bail conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, daily court appearance for 30 days, cooperation with investigation, and prohibition against tampering with evidence or absconding. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case