Ajith kumar vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station — 187/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 10th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM170004722026
Filing Number
465/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
187/2026
Registration Date
05-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
FIR Details
FIR Number
0
Police Station
ALL WOMEN P.S. THIRUVADANAI
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajith kumar
Respondent(s)
The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 05-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Thiruvadanai Judicial Magistrate Court granted bail to two accused persons (Ajithkumar and Subas Santharaboss) charged with assaulting and verbally abusing a police officer, preventing him from discharging duties, and threatening him with a broken bottle under BNS sections 132, 296(b), and 351(3). The court found that while the offenses were serious, continued incarceration was unwarranted given the substantially completed investigation, the accused's local residency reducing flight risk, and their seven days in custody. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting to court and police station, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Thiruvadanai Judicial Magistrate Court granted bail to two accused persons (Ajithkumar and Subas Santharaboss) charged with assaulting and verbally abusing a police officer, preventing him from discharging duties, and threatening him with a broken bottle under BNS sections 132, 296(b), and 351(3). The court found that while the offenses were serious, continued incarceration was unwarranted given the substantially completed investigation, the accused's local residency reducing flight risk, and their seven days in custody. Bail was granted on conditions including Rs. 10,000 bond each with sureties, daily reporting to court and police station, cooperation with investigation, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts