Govindan vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruppalaikudi Police Station — 178/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM170004482026

Filing Number

441/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

178/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govindan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruppalaikudi Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Thiruvadanai Judicial Magistrate granted bail to Govinthan, accused of stealing inverter batteries under sections 331(4) and 305 BNS, after 34 days in judicial custody. The court found the offense serious but not warranting continued incarceration, noted no flight risk due to his permanent local residence, and found the investigation substantially complete with no evidence of tampering or witness interference. The accused was released on a Rs. 10,000 personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily court reporting, non-commission of similar offenses, and full cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 178/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Thiruvadanai Judicial Magistrate granted bail to Govinthan, accused of stealing inverter batteries under sections 331(4) and 305 BNS, after 34 days in judicial custody. The court found the offense serious but not warranting continued incarceration, noted no flight risk due to his permanent local residence, and found the investigation substantially complete with no evidence of tampering or witness interference. The accused was released on a Rs. 10,000 personal bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily court reporting, non-commission of similar offenses, and full cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case