Govindan vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station — 177/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM170004472026

Filing Number

440/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

177/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govindan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai granted bail to Govinthan, accused of theft under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS, after he spent 83 days in judicial custody. The court found no significant flight risk, evidence tampering concerns, or necessity for continued incarceration, applying the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception. The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including daily court reporting, non-commission of similar offenses, cooperation with investigation, and no witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  7. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 177/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai granted bail to Govinthan, accused of theft under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS, after he spent 83 days in judicial custody. The court found no significant flight risk, evidence tampering concerns, or necessity for continued incarceration, applying the principle that bail is the rule and jail is the exception. The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including daily court reporting, non-commission of similar offenses, cooperation with investigation, and no witness interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case