Govindan vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station — 175/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM170004452026
Filing Number
438/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
175/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govindan
Respondent(s)
The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 04-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Thiruvadanai Judicial Magistrate Court granted bail to Govinthan, accused of stealing three batteries from a gram E-Sewa centre under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS. The court found that while the offense was serious, continued incarceration was unwarranted given the completed investigation, absence of flight risk (permanent resident), no evidence of witness tampering, and 52 days already spent in custody. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including daily court reporting, cooperation with trial, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Thiruvadanai Judicial Magistrate Court granted bail to Govinthan, accused of stealing three batteries from a gram E-Sewa centre under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS. The court found that while the offense was serious, continued incarceration was unwarranted given the completed investigation, absence of flight risk (permanent resident), no evidence of witness tampering, and 52 days already spent in custody. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and conditions including daily court reporting, cooperation with trial, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts