Govindan vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station — 171/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM170004412026
Filing Number
434/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
171/2026
Registration Date
03-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govindan
Respondent(s)
The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 03-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai granted bail to accused Govinthan, charged under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS for allegedly stealing three batteries from a gram E-Sewa center. The court found that after 52 days in judicial custody with investigation substantially complete, continued incarceration was unwarranted, as the accused posed no flight risk, evidence tampering risk, or danger of reoffending. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including daily court reporting at 10:30 AM and 5:00 PM, non-commission of similar offenses, and cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai granted bail to accused Govinthan, charged under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS for allegedly stealing three batteries from a gram E-Sewa center. The court found that after 52 days in judicial custody with investigation substantially complete, continued incarceration was unwarranted, as the accused posed no flight risk, evidence tampering risk, or danger of reoffending. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, subject to strict conditions including daily court reporting at 10:30 AM and 5:00 PM, non-commission of similar offenses, and cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts