Govindan vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station — 168/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM170004382026

Filing Number

431/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

168/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Govindan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, Thondi Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai granted bail to Govinthan, accused of stealing batteries and an inverter from a gram E-Sewa centre under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS. The court found that after 52 days in custody, the investigation was substantially complete, the accused posed no flight risk as a permanent resident, and continued incarceration was unwarranted. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily court reporting, non-commission of similar offenses, cooperation with investigations, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Issue of Service

    Judicial Magistrate

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 168/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Judicial Magistrate Court of Thiruvadanai granted bail to Govinthan, accused of stealing batteries and an inverter from a gram E-Sewa centre under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS. The court found that after 52 days in custody, the investigation was substantially complete, the accused posed no flight risk as a permanent resident, and continued incarceration was unwarranted. Bail was granted on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily court reporting, non-commission of similar offenses, cooperation with investigations, and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case