Govindan vs The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station — 166/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 11th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM170004362026
Filing Number
429/2026
Filing Date
03-03-2026
Registration No
166/2026
Registration Date
04-03-2026
Court
Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
2-Judicial Magistrate
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Govindan
Respondent(s)
The Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvadanai Police Station
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judicial Magistrate
Disposed
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 07-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 06-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
| 04-03-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvadanai allowed the bail petition of Govinthan, accused of stealing three batteries from a gram E-Sewa centre under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS. The court found that after 52 days in custody, the investigation was substantially complete, the accused posed no flight risk as a local resident, and there was no evidence of tampering or witness interference, warranting bail under the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily court appearances, cooperation with investigation, and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Judicial Magistrate Court in Thiruvadanai allowed the bail petition of Govinthan, accused of stealing three batteries from a gram E-Sewa centre under Sections 331(4) and 305 BNS. The court found that after 52 days in custody, the investigation was substantially complete, the accused posed no flight risk as a local resident, and there was no evidence of tampering or witness interference, warranting bail under the principle that "bail is rule and jail is exception." The accused was released on Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties and strict conditions including daily court appearances, cooperation with investigation, and non-commission of similar offenses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts