Perumal vs The Sub Inspector of Police, S.P.Pattinam Police Station — 163/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM170004332026

Filing Number

426/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

163/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Judicial Magistrate Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

2-Judicial Magistrate

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 480

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Perumal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Sub Inspector of Police, S.P.Pattinam Police Station

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of Judgment

    The Judicial Magistrate of Thiruvadanai granted bail to the accused Perumal, charged with trespassing, assault, verbal abuse, and life threats under BNS sections 329(3), 296(b), 115(2), 351(2), and TNPHW Act Section 4. The court found that while the offenses are serious, the accused poses no flight risk as a permanent resident, investigation is substantially complete, and continued incarceration is unwarranted after 8 days in custody. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, fortnightly police reporting for 30 days, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Judicial Magistrate

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Judicial Magistrate

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 163/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate of Thiruvadanai granted bail to the accused Perumal, charged with trespassing, assault, verbal abuse, and life threats under BNS sections 329(3), 296(b), 115(2), 351(2), and TNPHW Act Section 4. The court found that while the offenses are serious, the accused poses no flight risk as a permanent resident, investigation is substantially complete, and continued incarceration is unwarranted after 8 days in custody. Bail was granted on conditions including a Rs. 10,000 bond with two sureties, fortnightly police reporting for 30 days, non-interference with witnesses, and cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case