Mariya sengol vs Karmelmeri — 54/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM160010282022
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
54/2022
Filing Date
10-06-2022
Registration No
54/2022
Registration Date
10-06-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mariya sengol
Adv. Tr. K. Ramesh
Respondent(s)
Karmelmeri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
For further Proceedings
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-04-2026 | For further Proceedings |
| 12-03-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 16-02-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 29-01-2026 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
| 18-12-2025 | IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending |
Interim Orders
Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The District Munsif Court of Thiruvadanai granted a temporary injunction in favor of the Petitioner (Mariyasenkol) against the Respondent (Kaarmelmeri) on October 20, 2022. The court found that the Petitioner established a prima facie case of possession over the disputed property (Survey No. 393), with supporting documentation including patta and SLR records, and determined the balance of convenience favored restraining the Respondent from further construction during the pendency of the main suit. The Respondent is restrained from interfering with the Petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The District Munsif Court of Thiruvadanai granted a temporary injunction in favor of the Petitioner (Mariyasenkol) against the Respondent (Kaarmelmeri) on October 20, 2022. The court found that the Petitioner established a prima facie case of possession over the disputed property (Survey No. 393), with supporting documentation including patta and SLR records, and determined the balance of convenience favored restraining the Respondent from further construction during the pendency of the main suit. The Respondent is restrained from interfering with the Petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts