Mariya sengol vs Karmelmeri — 54/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: For further Proceedings. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

For further Proceedings Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM160010282022

Filing Number

54/2022

Filing Date

10-Jun-2022

Registration No

54/2022

Registration Date

10-Jun-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mariya sengol

    Adv. Tr. K. Ramesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Karmelmeri

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Apr-2026

    For further Proceedings

    District Munsif

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  4. 16-Feb-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  5. 29-Jan-2026

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  6. 18-Dec-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  8. 13-Oct-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  9. 23-Sep-2025

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  10. 22-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  11. 24-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  12. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  13. 08-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  14. 18-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  15. 25-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  16. 13-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  17. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  18. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  19. 15-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  20. 23-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  21. 26-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  22. 11-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  23. 05-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  24. 13-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  25. 29-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  26. 04-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  27. 18-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  28. 14-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  29. 03-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  30. 25-Apr-2024

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  31. 08-Apr-2024

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  32. 01-Apr-2024

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  33. 14-Mar-2024

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  34. 15-Feb-2024

    Orders

    District Munsif

  35. 29-Jan-2024

    Orders

    District Munsif

  36. 10-Jan-2024

    Orders

    District Munsif

  37. 02-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  38. 20-Dec-2023

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  39. 27-Nov-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  40. 31-Oct-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  41. 18-Oct-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  42. 06-Oct-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  43. 27-Sep-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  44. 22-Sep-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  45. 14-Sep-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  46. 08-Sep-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  47. 30-Aug-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  48. 21-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  49. 04-Aug-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  50. 05-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  51. 07-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  52. 01-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  53. 18-Apr-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  54. 20-Mar-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  55. 21-Feb-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  56. 27-Jan-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  57. 23-Dec-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  58. 22-Dec-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  59. 07-Dec-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  60. 11-Nov-2022

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  61. 20-Oct-2022

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The District Munsif Court of Thiruvadanai granted a temporary injunction in favor of the Petitioner (Mariyasenkol) against the Respondent (Kaarmelmeri) on October 20, 2022. The court found that the Petitioner established a prima facie case of possession over the disputed property (Survey No. 393), with supporting documentation including patta and SLR records, and determined the balance of convenience favored restraining the Respondent from further construction during the pendency of the main suit. The Respondent is restrained from interfering with the Petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  62. 20-Oct-2022

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  63. 23-Sep-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  64. 19-Sep-2022

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  65. 02-Sep-2022

    Orders

    District Munsif

  66. 26-Aug-2022

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  67. 23-Aug-2022

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  68. 08-Aug-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  69. 02-Aug-2022

    Steps

    District Munsif

  70. 21-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  71. 08-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  72. 08-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  73. 10-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 54/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Petition Allowed - Temporary Injunction Granted The District Munsif Court of Thiruvadanai granted a temporary injunction in favor of the Petitioner (Mariyasenkol) against the Respondent (Kaarmelmeri) on October 20, 2022. The court found that the Petitioner established a prima facie case of possession over the disputed property (Survey No. 393), with supporting documentation including patta and SLR records, and determined the balance of convenience favored restraining the Respondent from further construction during the pendency of the main suit. The Respondent is restrained from interfering with the Petitioner's peaceful possession of the disputed property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case