Selvi vs District Collector Ramanathapuram — 13/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Lok Adalat Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM160009582022

Filing Number

13/2022

Filing Date

05-Mar-2022

Registration No

13/2022

Registration Date

05-Mar-2022

Court

District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

1-District Munsif

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Selvi

    Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar

  2. 2.Sumathi

    Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar

  3. 3.Karthik

    Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar

  4. 4.Rethinam

    Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.District Collector Ramanathapuram

  2. 2.Tahsildhar

  3. 3.Jeyachitra

    Adv. Tr.S.B.Kannan

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    Mediation

    District Munsif

  5. 09-Dec-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif

  6. 28-Oct-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif

  7. 25-Sep-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif

  9. 24-Jul-2025

    Mediation

    District Munsif

  10. 19-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  11. 17-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  12. 08-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  13. 07-Mar-2025

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif

  14. 04-Mar-2025

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif

  15. 20-Feb-2025

    Lok Adalat

    District Munsif

  16. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  17. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  18. 10-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  19. 19-Nov-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

    This is a civil court judgment from the District Court of Tirupati dated November 19, 2024, in Original Case No. 13/2022. The judge conducted cross-examination of PW1 (first prosecution witness) and extensively scrutinized the petitioner's testimony regarding a succession certificate application. The court found numerous contradictions and inconsistencies in the witness's statements regarding the divorce of Muthulingham, the property details, and the genuineness of documents submitted. Based on the detailed analysis of the testimony, the court rejected the petitioner's claims and found the petition to lack merit, ultimately dismissing the succession certificate case due to insufficient and contradictory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  20. 19-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  21. 06-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  22. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  23. 17-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  24. 04-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  25. 20-Aug-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  26. 20-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  27. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  28. 04-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  29. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  30. 11-Jun-2024

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  31. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  32. 25-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  33. 03-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  34. 18-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  35. 05-Mar-2024

    Amendment

    District Munsif

  36. 14-Feb-2024

    Steps

    District Munsif

  37. 29-Jan-2024

    Orders

    District Munsif

  38. 12-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  39. 04-Jan-2024

    Enquiry

    District Munsif

  40. 15-Dec-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  41. 06-Dec-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  42. 22-Nov-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  43. 09-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  44. 07-Nov-2023

    IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending

    District Munsif

  45. 12-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  46. 13-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  47. 30-Aug-2023

    Copy of DepositionView PDF

  48. 30-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  49. 14-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  50. 11-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    District Munsif

  51. 07-Aug-2023

    Orders

    District Munsif

  52. 05-Aug-2023

    Orders

    District Munsif

  53. 04-Aug-2023

    Counter

    District Munsif

  54. 05-Jul-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  55. 07-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  56. 02-Jun-2023

    Trial

    District Munsif

  57. 18-Apr-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  58. 20-Mar-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  59. 21-Feb-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  60. 27-Jan-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  61. 10-Jan-2023

    Issues

    District Munsif

  62. 16-Dec-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  63. 05-Dec-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  64. 25-Nov-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  65. 09-Nov-2022

    Issues

    District Munsif

  66. 12-Oct-2022

    Service Pending

    District Munsif

  67. 14-Sep-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  68. 17-Aug-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  69. 27-Jul-2022

    Written Statement

    District Munsif

  70. 13-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  71. 05-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13/2022

casestatus.in Summary

This is a civil court judgment from the District Court of Tirupati dated November 19, 2024, in Original Case No. 13/2022. The judge conducted cross-examination of PW1 (first prosecution witness) and extensively scrutinized the petitioner's testimony regarding a succession certificate application. The court found numerous contradictions and inconsistencies in the witness's statements regarding the divorce of Muthulingham, the property details, and the genuineness of documents submitted. Based on the detailed analysis of the testimony, the court rejected the petitioner's claims and found the petition to lack merit, ultimately dismissing the succession certificate case due to insufficient and contradictory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case