Selvi vs District Collector Ramanathapuram — 13/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM160009582022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
13/2022
Filing Date
05-03-2022
Registration No
13/2022
Registration Date
05-03-2022
Court
District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Selvi
Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar
Sumathi
Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar
Karthik
Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar
Rethinam
Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar
Respondent(s)
District Collector Ramanathapuram
Tahsildhar
Jeyachitra
Adv. Tr.S.B.Kannan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Lok Adalat
Lok Adalat
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 06-03-2026 | Lok Adalat |
| 28-01-2026 | Mediation |
| 09-12-2025 | Mediation |
| 28-10-2025 | Mediation |
Interim Orders
This is a civil court judgment from the District Court of Tirupati dated November 19, 2024, in Original Case No. 13/2022. The judge conducted cross-examination of PW1 (first prosecution witness) and extensively scrutinized the petitioner's testimony regarding a succession certificate application. The court found numerous contradictions and inconsistencies in the witness's statements regarding the divorce of Muthulingham, the property details, and the genuineness of documents submitted. Based on the detailed analysis of the testimony, the court rejected the petitioner's claims and found the petition to lack merit, ultimately dismissing the succession certificate case due to insufficient and contradictory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil court judgment from the District Court of Tirupati dated November 19, 2024, in Original Case No. 13/2022. The judge conducted cross-examination of PW1 (first prosecution witness) and extensively scrutinized the petitioner's testimony regarding a succession certificate application. The court found numerous contradictions and inconsistencies in the witness's statements regarding the divorce of Muthulingham, the property details, and the genuineness of documents submitted. Based on the detailed analysis of the testimony, the court rejected the petitioner's claims and found the petition to lack merit, ultimately dismissing the succession certificate case due to insufficient and contradictory evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts