Pappathi vs Subiramanian Advocate - Tr.B.Karthikeyan — 53/2019

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM160006462022

Arguments

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

53/2019

Filing Date

13-09-2019

Registration No

53/2019

Registration Date

13-09-2019

Court

District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

Pappathi

Adv. Tr. K.R. Jegan

Pondy

Adv. Tr. K.R. Jegan

Thamizhselvi

Adv. Tr. K.R. Jegan

Respondent(s)

Subiramanian Advocate - Tr.B.Karthikeyan

Kannan

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

29-04-2026

Arguments

12-03-2026

Arguments

13-02-2026

Arguments

23-01-2026

Arguments

05-12-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

15-11-2023
Copy of Deposition

Summary: In Civil Case No. 53/2019 before the District Court of Tirupati dated 15.11.2023, the court rejected the defendant's (DW1 Subramaniam) testimony regarding claims to ancestral property. The court found that the defendant's assertions about receiving jewelry and gifts during his father-in-law's marriage, and claims of sole enjoyment of ancestral properties, were unsupported by documentary evidence and contradicted the plaintiff's position. The court held that the defendant has no right to claim ownership of the ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Case No. 53/2019 before the District Court of Tirupati dated 15.11.2023, the court rejected the defendant's (DW1 Subramaniam) testimony regarding claims to ancestral property. The court found that the defendant's assertions about receiving jewelry and gifts during his father-in-law's marriage, and claims of sole enjoyment of ancestral properties, were unsupported by documentary evidence and contradicted the plaintiff's position. The court held that the defendant has no right to claim ownership of the ancestral property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case