Maheswari vs Divisional Engineer Advocate - Tr.K.Ganeshaprabhu GP — 148/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7,Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM160001582023
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
158/2023
Filing Date
04-12-2023
Registration No
148/2023
Registration Date
04-12-2023
Court
District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Maheswari
Adv. Tr. K. Ramesh
Kalleswari
Adv. Tr. K. Ramesh
Raji
Adv. Tr. K. Ramesh
Respondent(s)
Divisional Engineer Advocate - Tr.K.Ganeshaprabhu GP
Divisional Engineer
Adv. Tr.K.Ganeshaprabhu GP
Assistant Divisional Engineer
Adv. Tr.K.Ganeshaprabhu GP
Sub Treasury Officer
Adv. Tr.K.Ganeshaprabhu GP
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 04-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 148/2023, Tirupuvanam District Civil Court Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff's (Mrs. Mageswari) claims are riddled with contradictions and lack legal merit. The plaintiff claimed to be the legally married wife of the deceased pension holder (Panneer Selvam) to claim his pension benefits, but her testimony revealed inconsistencies—particularly regarding the deceased's first wife (Pechiyammal) and conflicting statements about their marital status and nominee designation in the service register. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 148/2023, Tirupuvanam District Civil Court Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court found that the plaintiff's (Mrs. Mageswari) claims are riddled with contradictions and lack legal merit. The plaintiff claimed to be the legally married wife of the deceased pension holder (Panneer Selvam) to claim his pension benefits, but her testimony revealed inconsistencies—particularly regarding the deceased's first wife (Pechiyammal) and conflicting statements about their marital status and nominee designation in the service register. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts