Swakkin vs Jesu Advocate - Tr. S. Mangaleswaran — 101/2012
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Arguments. Next hearing: 30th April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM160000312022
Next Hearing
30th April 2026
Filing Number
101/2012
Filing Date
20-11-2012
Registration No
101/2012
Registration Date
20-11-2012
Court
District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Swakkin
Adv. Tr.N.Balaji
Chinnappan
Adv. Tr.N.Balaji
Rajendran
Adv. Tr.N.Balaji
Sengol
Adv. Tr.N.Balaji
Aarokiyum
Adv. Tr.N.Balaji
Respondent(s)
Jesu Advocate - Tr. S. Mangaleswaran
Sesumani
Adv. Tr. S. Mangaleswaran
Gasper
Adv. Tr. S. Mangaleswaran
Aarokiyum
Adv. Tr. S. Mangaleswaran
Aarokiyum
Adv. Tr. S. Mangaleswaran
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 17-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 13-03-2026 | Arguments |
Interim Orders
This is a Tamil language court document from the District Munsif Court, Tirupati (Original Case No. 101/2012) dated 06.02.2026. The document records the examination-in-chief testimony of PW3 (a village administrative officer) regarding survey numbers and land subdivisions during the UDR (Uniform Demand Register) period, specifically concerning field properties and pathway demarcation. The witness provided testimony about property records, subdivisions made in 2001, and land measurements, with the court accepting his sworn statements regarding the historical land classification and survey documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a Tamil language court document from the District Munsif Court, Tirupati (Original Case No. 101/2012) dated 06.02.2026. The document records the examination-in-chief testimony of PW3 (a village administrative officer) regarding survey numbers and land subdivisions during the UDR (Uniform Demand Register) period, specifically concerning field properties and pathway demarcation. The witness provided testimony about property records, subdivisions made in 2001, and land measurements, with the court accepting his sworn statements regarding the historical land classification and survey documentation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts