Rajagopal Thondi velalar Society Trustee vs Mathiyarasan Advocate - Tr. K. Sasikumar — 43/2007
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Enquiry. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM160000112022
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
43/2007
Filing Date
05-07-2007
Registration No
43/2007
Registration Date
05-07-2007
Court
District Munsif Court, Thiruvadanai
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rajagopal Thondi velalar Society Trustee
Adv. Tr.S.B.Kannan
Respondent(s)
Mathiyarasan Advocate - Tr. K. Sasikumar
Ramanathapuram District collector
Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar
Tahsildar Thiruvadanai
Adv. Tr. K. Sasikumar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Enquiry
Enquiry
Counter
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Enquiry |
| 13-02-2026 | Enquiry |
| 30-01-2026 | Counter |
| 19-01-2026 | Steps |
| 16-12-2025 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Original Case No. 43/2007, Mavaldt District Civil Court Date: 09.08.2023 The court dismissed the cross-examination objections raised by the defendant (DW1 - Sri. Madhiyarasan) regarding various documentary evidence, particularly survey file No. 53/2. The judge ruled that survey file No. 53/2 should be maintained as a separate entity (not merged with 53/1) and rejected the plaintiff's contentions that the documents were improperly filed or that procedural errors occurred in the presentation of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Original Case No. 43/2007, Mavaldt District Civil Court Date: 09.08.2023 The court dismissed the cross-examination objections raised by the defendant (DW1 - Sri. Madhiyarasan) regarding various documentary evidence, particularly survey file No. 53/2. The judge ruled that survey file No. 53/2 should be maintained as a separate entity (not merged with 53/1) and rejected the plaintiff's contentions that the documents were improperly filed or that procedural errors occurred in the presentation of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts