SI of AWPS Keelakkarai vs Poopalan Advocate - Thiru. ARUN KANNAN M. — 167/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 509. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM120003522022
Next Hearing
16th July 2026
Filing Number
352/2022
Filing Date
10-08-2022
Registration No
167/2022
Registration Date
12-08-2022
Court
Additional Mahila Court at Magisterial Level, Ramanathapuram
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
FIR Details
FIR Number
3
Police Station
ALL WOMEN P.S ,KEELAKARAI
Year
2020
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SI of AWPS Keelakkarai
Adv. Thiru. G.Elango
Respondent(s)
Poopalan Advocate - Thiru. ARUN KANNAN M.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 07-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final judgment) recorded on July 29, 2025, in Criminal Case No. 167/2022 at the Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram. The witness (PW-3) testified regarding an alleged sexual harassment case where a TV repair technician allegedly sent vulgar WhatsApp messages to the witness's wife. The witness provided his statement under oath, detailing how the technician's behavior and subsequent police complaint, followed by cross-examination by the defense. No order (bail, conviction, or acquittal) was issued—this document is merely the recorded testimony during the ongoing trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a witness deposition (not a final judgment) recorded on July 29, 2025, in Criminal Case No. 167/2022 at the Additional Mahila Court, Ramanathapuram. The witness (PW-3) testified regarding an alleged sexual harassment case where a TV repair technician allegedly sent vulgar WhatsApp messages to the witness's wife. The witness provided his statement under oath, detailing how the technician's behavior and subsequent police complaint, followed by cross-examination by the defense. No order (bail, conviction, or acquittal) was issued—this document is merely the recorded testimony during the ongoing trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts