Vignesh vs Bazaar PS — 77/2026
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 26th May 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM120001312026
Filing Number
132/2026
Filing Date
22-May-2026
Registration No
77/2026
Registration Date
22-May-2026
Court
Additional Mahila Court at Magisterial Level, Ramanathapuram
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
Decision Date
26-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
213
Police Station
B2 BAZAAR P.S, RAMANATHAPURAM
Year
2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vignesh
Adv. Thiru. R.Ajaykumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Bazaar PS (Police Station)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-May-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: Vignesh v. Bazaar PS (Cr.M.P. 77/2026) The Additional Women's Court in Ramanathapuram granted bail to Vignesh (age 32) in Criminal Case No. 213/2026 registered under sections 4 of TNPHW Act and sections 115(2), 296(b), 324(2), 351(3) BNS. The court found that Vignesh had been in judicial custody since May 21, 2026, most of the investigation was complete, and his family's financial circumstances warranted release. The court rejected the prosecution's objections that he might tamper with witnesses or abscond, determining bail would not prejudice the investigation. Bail conditions: ₹10,000 with two sureties; monthly police station reporting; daily 10:30 AM attendance; no witness interference; cooperation with investigation; appearance when summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-May-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
-
25-May-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
-
22-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
22-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 77/2026
Case Summary: Vignesh v. Bazaar PS (Cr.M.P. 77/2026) The Additional Women's Court in Ramanathapuram granted bail to Vignesh (age 32) in Criminal Case No. 213/2026 registered under sections 4 of TNPHW Act and sections 115(2), 296(b), 324(2), 351(3) BNS. The court found that Vignesh had been in judicial custody since May 21, 2026, most of the investigation was complete, and his family's financial circumstances warranted release. The court rejected the prosecution's objections that he might tamper with witnesses or abscond, determining bail would not prejudice the investigation. Bail conditions: ₹10,000 with two sureties; monthly police station reporting; daily 10:30 AM attendance; no witness interference; cooperation with investigation; appearance when summoned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts