Magarajothi vs The Inspector of Police, AWPS Ramanathapuram. — 10/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 17th April 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM120000142026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
15/2026
Filing Date
10-Jan-2026
Registration No
10/2026
Registration Date
12-Jan-2026
Court
Additional Mahila Court at Magisterial Level, Ramanathapuram
Judge
3-Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
Decision Date
17-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Magarajothi
Adv. SURESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Inspector of Police, AWPS Ramanathapuram.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Apr-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Additional District Women's Court in Ramanathapuram granted a petition under CrPC Section 175(3), directing the police to conduct a preliminary inquiry and file a First Information Report (FIR) against three respondents accused of dowry harassment, physical abuse, threats with weapons, and wrongful retention of the petitioner's 13-pound wedding jewelry. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of cruelty, dowry demands, and intimidation warranting criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
Disposed
Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
-
15-Apr-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
-
12-Mar-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
-
10-Feb-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
-
07-Feb-2026
Orders
Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
-
03-Feb-2026
Enquiry
Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court
-
12-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 10/2026
Summary The Additional District Women's Court in Ramanathapuram granted a petition under CrPC Section 175(3), directing the police to conduct a preliminary inquiry and file a First Information Report (FIR) against three respondents accused of dowry harassment, physical abuse, threats with weapons, and wrongful retention of the petitioner's 13-pound wedding jewelry. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of cruelty, dowry demands, and intimidation warranting criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts