DSP, Paramakudi vs Subash Advocate - Thiru. ARUN KANNAN M. — 20/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 294(b),323,506(i). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case
CNR: TNRM110003412023
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
341/2023
Filing Date
10-03-2023
Registration No
20/2023
Registration Date
11-04-2023
Court
Special Court for the exclusive trial of SC and ST Cases, Ramanathapuram
Judge
3-Sessions Judge, Sessions court for SC/ST Act Cases
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DSP (Deputy Superintendent of Police), Paramakudi
Adv. Thriu. Ramakrishnan V.T.
Respondent(s)
Subash Advocate - Thiru. ARUN KANNAN M.
Arun
Adv. Thiru. ARUN KANNAN M.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Sessions Judge, Sessions court for SC/ST Act Cases
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 12-12-2025 | Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Special Court for SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989 | Ramanathapuram | Spl. Sessions Case No. 20/2023 The court recorded depositions of prosecution witnesses (Munisamy and Ajaykumar) on 16.02.2026 in a case involving allegations under the SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989. Both witnesses were examined-in-chief by the prosecution, found to be hostile witnesses per BNSS Section 355, and permitted cross-examination by the prosecution; no cross-examination was conducted by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Special Court for SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989 | Ramanathapuram | Spl. Sessions Case No. 20/2023 The court recorded depositions of prosecution witnesses (Munisamy and Ajaykumar) on 16.02.2026 in a case involving allegations under the SC/ST(POA) Act, 1989. Both witnesses were examined-in-chief by the prosecution, found to be hostile witnesses per BNSS Section 355, and permitted cross-examination by the prosecution; no cross-examination was conducted by the defense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
More from this court
Special Court for the exclusive trial of SC and ST Cases, Ramanathapuram All courts →Explore other courts