Ajith alias Vigneshwaran vs Police of Kamuthi — 55/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition

CNR: TNRM110000602026

Filing Number

59/2026

Filing Date

16-Feb-2026

Registration No

55/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Special Court for the exclusive trial of SC and ST Cases, Ramanathapuram

Judge

3-Sessions Judge, Sessions court for SC/ST Act Cases

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Allowed

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 348

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ajith alias Vigneshwaran

    Adv. Thiru. K.Gunasekaran

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Police of Kamuthi

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Sessions Judge, Sessions court for SC/ST Act Cases

  3. 02-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    The Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act cases in Ramanathapuram allowed the accused's petition to recall two witnesses (PW20 and PW23) for cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC, despite their earlier examination in August and October 2025. The court granted the petition on the ground that the accused had been in judicial custody for over 2 years and no serious prejudice would result to the prosecution, conditioning the allowance on payment of Rs. 1,000 to the District Mediation Centre by March 5, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Sessions Judge, Sessions court for SC/ST Act Cases

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Orders

    Sessions Judge, Sessions court for SC/ST Act Cases

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 16-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 55/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act cases in Ramanathapuram allowed the accused's petition to recall two witnesses (PW20 and PW23) for cross-examination under Section 311 CrPC, despite their earlier examination in August and October 2025. The court granted the petition on the ground that the accused had been in judicial custody for over 2 years and no serious prejudice would result to the prosecution, conditioning the allowance on payment of Rs. 1,000 to the District Mediation Centre by March 5, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case