DSP. Paramakudi vs Saravanan Advocate - Thiru. M.MAYAKANNAN — 43/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 147. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
SPL.SC - Special Sessions Case
CNR: TNRM110000012020
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
3/2020
Filing Date
30-08-2019
Registration No
43/2019
Registration Date
30-08-2019
Court
Special Court for the exclusive trial of SC and ST Cases, Ramanathapuram
Judge
3-Sessions Judge, Sessions court for SC/ST Act Cases
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
DSP (Deputy Superintendent of Police). Paramakudi
Adv. Spl.P.P
Respondent(s)
Saravanan Advocate - Thiru. M.MAYAKANNAN
Muthupandi
Adv. Thiru. M.MAYAKANNAN
Vinoth
Adv. Thiru. M.MAYAKANNAN
Ajith
Adv. Thiru. M.MAYAKANNAN
Balakrishnan
Adv. A. Manoharan
Latha
Adv. Thiru. S. Chellamani B.A., B.L.,
Maheswari
Adv. Thiru. M.MAYAKANNAN
Mareeswarai
Adv. Thiru. M.MAYAKANNAN
Hearing History
Judge: 3-Sessions Judge, Sessions court for SC/ST Act Cases
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: In Special Court Case No. 43/2019 dated 06.03.2026 (Ramanathapuram), a petition under BNSS Section 355 was allowed. The court conducted cross-examination of defendants 5 and 6, accepting their cross-examination as presented and declining to conduct separate cross-examination by other defendants. The court found that defendants 5 and 6 have provided reasonable explanations regarding the alleged incident and witnesses, and their cross-examination has been completed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Copy of Oral Evidence/Deposition
Case Summary: In Special Court Case No. 43/2019 dated 06.03.2026 (Ramanathapuram), a petition under BNSS Section 355 was allowed. The court conducted cross-examination of defendants 5 and 6, accepting their cross-examination as presented and declining to conduct separate cross-examination by other defendants. The court found that defendants 5 and 6 have provided reasonable explanations regarding the alleged incident and witnesses, and their cross-examination has been completed accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
More from this court
Special Court for the exclusive trial of SC and ST Cases, Ramanathapuram All courts →Explore other courts