Sub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S. vs munishwaran,ramasamy,petchiyammal — 23/2025
Case under Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section munishwaran,ramasamy,petchiyammalSub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM100057492024
e-Filing Number
27-11-2024
Filing Number
5702/2024
Filing Date
28-11-2024
Registration No
23/2025
Registration Date
28-01-2025
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi
Judge
100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
16
Police Station
Sikkal
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S.
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Sikkal PS
Respondent(s)
munishwaran,ramasamy,petchiyammal
Hearing History
Judge: 100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Disposed
Questioning
Questioning
Evidence
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 13-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 05-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Kadaladi acquitted all three accused persons under the benefit of doubt. The court found that while the prosecution witnesses testified about alleged assault and criminal intimidation on February 12, 2024, the key prosecution witnesses (complainant and eyewitness) later reconciled with the accused and provided conflicting statements, with the complainant admitting he couldn't recall details of the incident. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 506(ii) beyond reasonable doubt, and ordered the accused's release under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Kadaladi acquitted all three accused persons under the benefit of doubt. The court found that while the prosecution witnesses testified about alleged assault and criminal intimidation on February 12, 2024, the key prosecution witnesses (complainant and eyewitness) later reconciled with the accused and provided conflicting statements, with the complainant admitting he couldn't recall details of the incident. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 506(ii) beyond reasonable doubt, and ordered the accused's release under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts