Sub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S. vs munishwaran,ramasamy,petchiyammal — 23/2025

Case under Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section munishwaran,ramasamy,petchiyammalSub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S. Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 23rd March 2026.

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM100057492024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

27-11-2024

Filing Number

5702/2024

Filing Date

28-11-2024

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

28-01-2025

Court

District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi

Judge

100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

Decision Date

23rd March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

FIR Details

FIR Number

16

Police Station

Sikkal

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Mp/1/2025 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section munishwaran,ramasamy,petchiyammalSub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S
Mp/3/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Sub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S
Mp/4/2026 Classification : 320 Cr.pc Section munishwaran,ramasamy,petchiyammalSub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S
Mp/5/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section Sub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S
Mp/6/2026 Classification : 317 Cr.pc Section munishwaran,ramasamy,petchiyammalSub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S

Petitioner(s)

Sub Inspector of Police, Sikkal P.S.

Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Sikkal PS

Respondent(s)

munishwaran,ramasamy,petchiyammal

Hearing History

Judge: 100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

23-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Questioning

13-03-2026

Questioning

12-03-2026

Evidence

05-03-2026

Trial

Final Orders / Judgements

23-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Kadaladi acquitted all three accused persons under the benefit of doubt. The court found that while the prosecution witnesses testified about alleged assault and criminal intimidation on February 12, 2024, the key prosecution witnesses (complainant and eyewitness) later reconciled with the accused and provided conflicting statements, with the complainant admitting he couldn't recall details of the incident. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 506(ii) beyond reasonable doubt, and ordered the accused's release under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court in Kadaladi acquitted all three accused persons under the benefit of doubt. The court found that while the prosecution witnesses testified about alleged assault and criminal intimidation on February 12, 2024, the key prosecution witnesses (complainant and eyewitness) later reconciled with the accused and provided conflicting statements, with the complainant admitting he couldn't recall details of the incident. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish the charges under IPC sections 294(b), 323, 324, and 506(ii) beyond reasonable doubt, and ordered the accused's release under CrPC Section 248(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case