FRANCY MARIAKANI vs JHANI SAMRAJ JOSEPH — 30/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 144. Status: Trial. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
MC - Maintenance Case
CNR: TNRM100049082024
e-Filing Number
28-10-2024
Filing Number
4863/2024
Filing Date
29-Oct-2024
Registration No
30/2024
Registration Date
18-Nov-2024
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi
Judge
100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.FRANCY MARIAKANI
Adv. G.Muthukumar
-
2.JEBIN HEPZIBHA
Adv. G.Muthukumar
-
3.THABITHAL
Adv. G.Muthukumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.JHANI SAMRAJ JOSEPH
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
06-Mar-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
16-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
02-Feb-2026
Copy of Judgment
-
02-Feb-2026
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
20-Jan-2026
CMPPending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
09-Jan-2026
CMPPending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
19-Dec-2025
CMPPending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
05-Dec-2025
CMPPending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
21-Nov-2025
CMPPending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
07-Nov-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
17-Oct-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
29-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
23-Sep-2025
IA / Ea Pending / Cmp Pending / CRP Pending / Cma Pending
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
15-Sep-2025
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
29-Aug-2025
Orders
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
13-Aug-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
13-Aug-2025
Copy of depositionView PDF
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi (Case MC.No.30/2024, dated 13.08.2025) accepted the deposition of witness Thasan (PW2) and admitted the affidavit evidence as the first examination witness statement. The court found discrepancies between the affidavit and oral testimony regarding property-related disputes and directed that the petition be disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Aug-2025
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
25-Jul-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
18-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
11-Jul-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
23-Jun-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
28-May-2025
Ex-Parte Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
16-May-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
09-May-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
23-Apr-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
25-Mar-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
08-Mar-2025
Counter
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
06-Mar-2025
Lok Adalat
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
04-Mar-2025
Appearance
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
30-Jan-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
07-Jan-2025
Issue of Service
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
18-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2024
The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi (Case MC.No.30/2024, dated 13.08.2025) accepted the deposition of witness Thasan (PW2) and admitted the affidavit evidence as the first examination witness statement. The court found discrepancies between the affidavit and oral testimony regarding property-related disputes and directed that the petition be disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts