Sub Inspector of Police Sikkal PS vs Gopi,karuppaiya Advocate - Thiru. M.Alagumuthu Ariyappan — 117/2024

Case under Police Force (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966 Section 294(b),323,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - Calendar Case

CNR: TNRM100033722024

e-Filing Number

19-07-2024

Filing Number

3345/2024

Filing Date

20-Jul-2024

Registration No

117/2024

Registration Date

30-Jul-2024

Court

District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi

Judge

100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Acquitted

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Police Force (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966 Section 294(b),323,506(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sub Inspector of Police Sikkal PS (Police Station)

    Adv. APP

  2. 2.83/24 Sikkal Ps (Police Station)

    Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Sikkal PS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Gopi,karuppaiya Advocate - Thiru. M.Alagumuthu Ariyappan

  2. 2.Karuppaiya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court of Kadaladi acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, and 506 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and incomplete witness examination, thus applying the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  4. 04-Mar-2026

    Judgement

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Questioning

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  7. 30-Oct-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  8. 18-Sep-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  9. 24-Jul-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  10. 10-Jun-2025

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  11. 10-Dec-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  12. 05-Dec-2024

    Service Pending-Non Bailable Warrant

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  13. 05-Sep-2024

    Trial

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  14. 27-Aug-2024

    Framing of Charges

    District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi

  15. 30-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 20-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court of Kadaladi acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, and 506 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and incomplete witness examination, thus applying the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case