Sub Inspector of Police Sikkal PS vs Gopi,karuppaiya Advocate - Thiru. M.Alagumuthu Ariyappan — 117/2024
Case under Police Force (Restriction of Rights) Act, 1966 Section 294(b),323,506(2). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 06th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM100033722024
e-Filing Number
19-07-2024
Filing Number
3345/2024
Filing Date
20-07-2024
Registration No
117/2024
Registration Date
30-07-2024
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi
Judge
100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of Police Sikkal PS (Police Station)
Adv. APP
83/24 Sikkal Ps (Police Station)
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Sikkal PS
Respondent(s)
Gopi,karuppaiya Advocate - Thiru. M.Alagumuthu Ariyappan
Karuppaiya
Hearing History
Judge: 100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Trial
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 04-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 02-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 08-01-2026 | Trial |
| 30-10-2025 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court of Kadaladi acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, and 506 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and incomplete witness examination, thus applying the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Judgment Summary The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court of Kadaladi acquitted both defendants of charges under IPC Sections 294(b), 323, and 506 due to insufficient evidence. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting inconsistencies in the complainant's testimony and incomplete witness examination, thus applying the benefit of doubt in favor of the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts