Sub Inspector of Police Kadaladi PS vs Esakki ganesh — 325/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 281,125(b). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 15th April 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM100029362025
e-Filing Number
26-10-2025
Filing Number
2895/2025
Filing Date
27-10-2025
Registration No
325/2025
Registration Date
27-10-2025
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi
Judge
100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Decision Date
15th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
81
Police Station
KADALADI P.S
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of Police Kadaladi PS (Police Station)
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Kadaladi PS
Respondent(s)
Esakki ganesh
Hearing History
Judge: 100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Trial
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-04-2026 | Judgement |
| 07-04-2026 | Questioning |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Trial |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The District Magistrate Court in Kadaladi acquitted the accused (Ishakki Ganeesh, age 25) of charges under BNS Sections 281 (rash or negligent act endangering human life) and 125(b) (causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety) on April 15, 2026. The court found that while a vehicle accident occurred on October 6, 2025, resulting in injuries to a passenger, the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence, as key witnesses (medical personnel, investigating officer, accident witnesses) were not examined and the complainant's testimony contradicted the case narrative, warranting acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The District Magistrate Court in Kadaladi acquitted the accused (Ishakki Ganeesh, age 25) of charges under BNS Sections 281 (rash or negligent act endangering human life) and 125(b) (causing hurt by act endangering life or personal safety) on April 15, 2026. The court found that while a vehicle accident occurred on October 6, 2025, resulting in injuries to a passenger, the prosecution failed to prove the charges beyond reasonable doubt through credible evidence, as key witnesses (medical personnel, investigating officer, accident witnesses) were not examined and the complainant's testimony contradicted the case narrative, warranting acquittal under the benefit of doubt principle. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts