Sub Inspector of Police, Sayalkudi PS vs Moorthy alias krishnamoorthi Advocate - P.Dharmaraj — 205/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 25th March 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM100023192025
e-Filing Number
30-07-2025
Filing Number
2296/2025
Filing Date
31-07-2025
Registration No
205/2025
Registration Date
11-08-2025
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi
Judge
100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
FIR Details
FIR Number
53
Police Station
Sayalkudi
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sub Inspector of Police, Sayalkudi PS (Police Station)
Adv. INSPECTOR OF POLICE SAYALKUDI PS
Respondent(s)
Moorthy alias krishnamoorthi Advocate - P.Dharmaraj
Kannan
Manikandan
Hearing History
Judge: 100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Disposed
Judgement
Questioning
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 23-03-2026 | Judgement |
| 16-03-2026 | Questioning |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Court Judgment The District Munsif Judicial Magistrate court in Kadaladi acquitted all three defendants of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(2), and 115(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant recanted his testimony during trial and reconciled with the accused, while key eyewitnesses were not examined, leading the court to conclude the evidence was insufficient to establish the alleged assault and criminal intimidation case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary of Court Judgment The District Munsif Judicial Magistrate court in Kadaladi acquitted all three defendants of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 118(1), 351(2), and 115(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The complainant recanted his testimony during trial and reconciled with the accused, while key eyewitnesses were not examined, leading the court to conclude the evidence was insufficient to establish the alleged assault and criminal intimidation case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts