SAYALKUDI PS vs PONNUTHAI — 356/2025
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Disposed: Uncontested--Allowed on 06th March 2026.
CRLMP - Criminal Miscellaneous Petition
CNR: TNRM100018532024
e-Filing Number
16-04-2024
Filing Number
1837/2024
Filing Date
17-04-2024
Registration No
356/2025
Registration Date
27-10-2025
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi
Judge
100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--Allowed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAYALKUDI PS (Police Station)
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
PONNUTHAI
Hearing History
Judge: 100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Disposed
Orders
Orders
Orders
Issue of Service
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-02-2026 | Orders |
| 20-02-2026 | Orders |
| 13-02-2026 | Orders |
| 27-01-2026 | Issue of Service |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary In this theft case (Cr.No.346/2021) from Sayalkudi Police Station, the court found that the police investigation was incomplete and inadequate. The complainant reported the theft of 3.5 pounds of gold chain and 4 pounds of tali (necklace) worth ₹1,12,500 during a temple festival. The court noted that the investigating officer failed to examine CCTV footage from the crime scene, did not record statements from available witnesses, and did not pursue the investigation diligently despite multiple changes in investigation officers. Consequently, the court set aside the "undetected" final report and ordered a fresh, thorough investigation to be completed by April 10, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In this theft case (Cr.No.346/2021) from Sayalkudi Police Station, the court found that the police investigation was incomplete and inadequate. The complainant reported the theft of 3.5 pounds of gold chain and 4 pounds of tali (necklace) worth ₹1,12,500 during a temple festival. The court noted that the investigating officer failed to examine CCTV footage from the crime scene, did not record statements from available witnesses, and did not pursue the investigation diligently despite multiple changes in investigation officers. Consequently, the court set aside the "undetected" final report and ordered a fresh, thorough investigation to be completed by April 10, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts