sikkal vs Dhinakaran,pakkiyaraj Advocate - Mr.B.Boomurugan — 53/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 296(b),115(2),351(3). Disposed: Contested--Acquitted on 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM100007902025
e-Filing Number
22-02-2025
Filing Number
786/2025
Filing Date
24-Feb-2025
Registration No
53/2025
Registration Date
06-Mar-2025
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi
Judge
100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Acquitted
Last updated 16-Jul-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
89
Police Station
Sikkal
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.sikkal
Adv. Sub Inspector of Police Sikkal PS
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dhinakaran,pakkiyaraj Advocate - Mr.B.Boomurugan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 53/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Dhinakaran and Pakkiyaraj) of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), and 351(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The defendants were ordered released under section 271(1) BNS, and their bail bonds were cancelled. Key Reasoning: Despite six government witnesses testifying to an alleged assault on July 29, 2024, significant inconsistencies and contradictions emerged. The complainant's own testimony conflicted regarding how the incident occurred, eyewitnesses' accounts contradicted each other about the assault location, and critical forensic evidence (injury report) failed to specify who inflicted the injuries. The court found reasonable doubt regarding witnesses' presence at the scene and the credibility of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Disposed
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
02-Jun-2026
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
26-May-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
19-May-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
12-May-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
07-May-2026
Reopen
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
30-Apr-2026
Reopen
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
27-Apr-2026
Judgement
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
21-Apr-2026
Arguments
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
15-Apr-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
15-Apr-2026
Questioning
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
09-Apr-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
05-Mar-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
17-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Copy of depositionView PDF
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
27-Nov-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
23-Sep-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
31-Jul-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
12-Jun-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
08-May-2025
Trial
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
07-May-2025
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
02-May-2025
Framing of Charges
District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
-
06-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 53/2025
Case Summary: CC No. 53/2025 Court Decision: The court acquitted both defendants (Dhinakaran and Pakkiyaraj) of charges under BNS sections 296(b), 115(2), and 351(2), finding the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The defendants were ordered released under section 271(1) BNS, and their bail bonds were cancelled. Key Reasoning: Despite six government witnesses testifying to an alleged assault on July 29, 2024, significant inconsistencies and contradictions emerged. The complainant's own testimony conflicted regarding how the incident occurred, eyewitnesses' accounts contradicted each other about the assault location, and critical forensic evidence (injury report) failed to specify who inflicted the injuries. The court found reasonable doubt regarding witnesses' presence at the scene and the credibility of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts