The Special Sub Inspector of Police, Valinokkam PS vs Satham Hussain — 45/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,511. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.
CC - Calendar Case
CNR: TNRM100001262023
Next Hearing
09th June 2026
Filing Number
108/2023
Filing Date
27-04-2023
Registration No
45/2023
Registration Date
27-04-2023
Court
District Munsif and Judicial Magistrate Court, Kadaladi
Judge
100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
FIR Details
FIR Number
31
Police Station
Valinockam PS
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The Special Sub Inspector of Police, Valinokkam PS (Police Station)
Adv. A.P.P
Respondent(s)
Satham Hussain
Hearing History
Judge: 100-District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Remand
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 19-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 06-02-2026 | Remand |
Interim Orders
This document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness 3 (PW3) in case CC-45/2023 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi on 06.02.2026. The witness testified regarding a theft of gold jewelry that occurred on 09.04.2023 when the accused allegedly broke into the witness's home and stole a gold bangle belonging to the witness's mother. The accused was absent during proceedings, and a petition filed under Section 317 CrPC (examination of witness in absence of accused) was allowed; no cross-examination was conducted as the accused's counsel did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the deposition of Prosecution Witness 3 (PW3) in case CC-45/2023 before the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Kadaladi on 06.02.2026. The witness testified regarding a theft of gold jewelry that occurred on 09.04.2023 when the accused allegedly broke into the witness's home and stole a gold bangle belonging to the witness's mother. The accused was absent during proceedings, and a petition filed under Section 317 CrPC (examination of witness in absence of accused) was allowed; no cross-examination was conducted as the accused's counsel did not appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts