Ramaiya vs Kumaravelu Advocate - Mr.D.Sowmia Narayanan — 2/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 21Rule11,Or21Ru35. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

EP - Execution Petition

CNR: TNRM090000702021

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

06th April 2026

Filing Number

86/2021

Filing Date

25-11-2021

Registration No

2/2021

Registration Date

02-12-2021

Court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 21Rule11,Or21Ru35
Indian Stamp Act, 1899 Section 14
Ea/5/2026 Classification : Petition to Appoint Commissioner Section KumaraveluRamaiya

Petitioner(s)

Ramaiya

Adv. Mr.K.Umashankar

Respondent(s)

Kumaravelu Advocate - Mr.D.Sowmia Narayanan

Late Rasaiyaa

Pooranam

Chellathai

Lakhsmi

Selvakumari

Gandhimathi

Santhanakumar

Manickam

Selvarani

Pothum Ponnu

Charles alais Sarathkumar

Minor Buvaneshwari

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

01-04-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

27-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

17-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

12-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

07-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

10-12-2025
Other wise

Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court dismissed the petitioners'/defendants' application seeking stay of execution proceedings pending disposal of a second appeal before the Madras High Court. The court held that mere pendency of a second appeal cannot ground a stay of execution, and the petitioners must seek stay from the appellate court itself under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC, not from the executing court under Order XXI Rule 26 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Petition Dismissed. The District Munsif Court dismissed the petitioners'/defendants' application seeking stay of execution proceedings pending disposal of a second appeal before the Madras High Court. The court held that mere pendency of a second appeal cannot ground a stay of execution, and the petitioners must seek stay from the appellate court itself under Order XLI Rule 5 CPC, not from the executing court under Order XXI Rule 26 CPC. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case