Mohanadas vs Krishnammal and 5 others Advocate - Mr.K.Govindasamy — 1000056/2018
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 7,Rule 1,Section 26. Status: Amendment. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
OS - Original Suit
CNR: TNRM090000592018
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
1000056/2018
Filing Date
08-06-2018
Registration No
1000056/2018
Registration Date
21-06-2018
Court
District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohanadas
Adv. Mr.S.Chandrasekaran
Respondent(s)
Krishnammal and 5 others Advocate - Mr.K.Govindasamy
Murugan
Adv. Mr.K.Govindasamy
Pandiammal
Adv. Mr.T.Dhinakararajan
Arunagiri
Adv. Tr.K.Velusamy
Savithiri
Adv. Mr.T.Dhinakararajan
Malathy
Adv. Mr.T.Dhinakararajan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Amendment
Service Pending
Steps
Steps
Steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Amendment |
| 12-03-2026 | Service Pending |
| 06-03-2026 | Steps |
| 27-02-2026 | Steps |
| 20-02-2026 | Steps |
Interim Orders
Summary: The District Munsif court in Mudukulathur allowed the petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of CPC. The court granted permission to implead seven proposed defendants (7-13) as necessary parties to the main suit concerning property Survey No. 417/10, which was discovered to have been subdivided into three separate survey numbers. The court found that since the main suit seeks recovery of possession and declaration, the persons currently holding pattas (land titles) for the subdivided properties must be made parties to ensure an effective decree can be issued. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The District Munsif court in Mudukulathur allowed the petition filed under Order 1 Rule 10(2) of CPC. The court granted permission to implead seven proposed defendants (7-13) as necessary parties to the main suit concerning property Survey No. 417/10, which was discovered to have been subdivided into three separate survey numbers. The court found that since the main suit seeks recovery of possession and declaration, the persons currently holding pattas (land titles) for the subdivided properties must be made parties to ensure an effective decree can be issued. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts