Palsamy( died) and 9 others vs Lakshmi through her Power Agent A.Murugesan Advocate - . — 100094/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section order 7,Rule 1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 01st June 2026.
OS - Original Suit (Title)
CNR: TNRM090000592013
Next Hearing
01st June 2026
Filing Number
100094/2013
Filing Date
18-12-2013
Registration No
100094/2013
Registration Date
18-12-2013
Court
District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur
Judge
1-District Munsif
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Palsamy( died) and 9 others
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Vilangar
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Vallimayil
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Indirani
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Chandran
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Nagarajan
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Kalimuthu
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Selvi
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Shanthi
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Shanthi
Adv. Mr.S.Periyasamy
Respondent(s)
Lakshmi through her Power Agent A.Murugesan Advocate - .
Hearing History
Judge: 1-District Munsif
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 08-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-03-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 94/2013) heard on 27.04.2026 concerning a property dispute over land boundaries and ownership rights. The court examined the 2nd defendant's cross-examination regarding survey numbers, property measurements, land boundaries, and competing claims to the disputed property. The examination concluded at 11:50 AM with no further cross-examination, and the court proceeded with recording witness testimony and evidence on the disputed survey parcels and their respective ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a civil suit (O.S. No. 94/2013) heard on 27.04.2026 concerning a property dispute over land boundaries and ownership rights. The court examined the 2nd defendant's cross-examination regarding survey numbers, property measurements, land boundaries, and competing claims to the disputed property. The examination concluded at 11:50 AM with no further cross-examination, and the court proceeded with recording witness testimony and evidence on the disputed survey parcels and their respective ownership claims. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts