Shakira banu vs Jagupar nisha — 49/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 rule 1. Status: IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

OS - Original Suit

CNR: TNRM090000572025

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Next Hearing

06th April 2026

e-Filing Number

19-12-2025

Filing Number

68/2025

Filing Date

19-12-2025

Registration No

49/2025

Registration Date

19-12-2025

Court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur

Judge

1-District Munsif

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7 rule 1
Ia/1/2025 Classification : 151 Petition Section Shakira banu
Ia/2/2025 Classification : Injunction Petition Section Shakira banu
Ia/4/2026 Classification : Injunction Petition Section Shakira banuJagupar nisha

Petitioner(s)

Shakira banu

Adv. MUNEESWARAN R

Respondent(s)

Jagupar nisha

Hearing History

Judge: 1-District Munsif

23-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

11-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

06-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

04-03-2026

Service Pending

02-03-2026

IA / EA Pending / CMP Pending / CRP Pending / CMA Pending

Interim Orders

19-02-2026
Other wise

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by Shakira Banu against Jakubar Nisha was allowed. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from making any constructions on the disputed 2-foot vacant space on the western side of the plaintiff's property until the main suit is disposed. The court found that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff as there was an admitted boundary dispute and the defendant was actively constructing, which could cause irreparable loss to the plaintiff's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The petition for temporary injunction filed by Shakira Banu against Jakubar Nisha was allowed. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendant from making any constructions on the disputed 2-foot vacant space on the western side of the plaintiff's property until the main suit is disposed. The court found that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff as there was an admitted boundary dispute and the defendant was actively constructing, which could cause irreparable loss to the plaintiff's interests. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

District Munsif Court, Mudhukulathur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case